.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

We have -
Moved To:

The E.Newspaper
By Dr. Howdy, Ph.D.
A.P.E., N.U.T.

Check Out Comments -
Humor + Letters From Readers
Add Something Yourself



The problem with evolutionists isn't just that
they can't see God at work. It's that they refuse
to see Him at work.


The Darwinist's Blinders
by Matt Kaufman

"This will be a nice slap in their big fat face."

The words sound like something you'd hear on a grade-school playground, but they actually come from someone a little higher up the educational chain: one Paul Mirecki, chairman of the University of Kansas religious-studies department. And just which faces does he delight in slapping? Why, the faces of Christians — and not just because he wants to see if they'll turn the other cheek.

Mirecki, you see, is a faculty adviser to something called the Society of Open-Minded Atheists and Agnostics. A few weeks back he e-mailed members of that group telling them he'd be teaching a class titled Special Topics in Religion: Intelligent Design, Creationisms [sic] and Other Religious Mythologies." Note that last word, because Mirecki stresses it. "The fundies [fundamentalists] want it all taught in a science class, but this will be a nice slap in their big fat face by teaching it in a religious studies class under the category mythology," he smirked.

You may be wondering whether this is the sort of attitude befitting a man who claims to be "open-minded," much less one who's overseeing a whole department of religious studies. But it turns out to be par for the course for the good Dr. Mirecki: He likes to address e-mails to this group to "my fellow damned," and to close with "Doing my part to ____ off the religious right, Evil Dr. P."

For that matter, if he's to be believed, it may be par for the course for the entire department. "The majority of my colleagues here in the dept. are agnostics or atheists, or they just don't care," Mirecki has written. "If any of [the other professors] are theists, it hasn't been obvious to me in the 15 years I've been here."

The same, alas, might well be true at many universities. Mirecki stands out, however, because someone posted his missive on a Yahoo! listserv — and when folks heard about it, they weren't too happy. Lots of them protested, including legislators, and even KU's chancellor called the comments "repugnant and vile." Under fire and garnering wide criticism, Mirecki issued one of those weak "apologies" people give when they don't want to apologize. (He called his e-mail "ill-advised.") Somehow this didn't strike people as an especially sincere expression of regret: "He's not sorry he wrote it," said one legislator, "He's sorry he got caught." So less than two weeks after his "ill-advised" scribbling, Mirecki cancelled the class and — whether by choice or under pressure is unclear — stepped down as head of the department.

Things take a turn for the weird after that: Mirecki said he was beaten up by a couple of strangers for his outspokenness. Some people have their doubts about his story, perhaps including investigators for the sheriff's department, which Mirecki is threatening to sue, essentially for not taking him seriously enough. Only time will tell whether he's telling the truth or making a ploy for public sympathy and martyrdom. (The latter has been known to happen, especially on campuses.)

But regardless of the outcome of that investigation, it's worth taking a good long look at what we do know about Mirecki, and others like him — for there are a lot of people like him. He isn't just a classic atheist, but a classic evolutionist. He bubbles over with contempt for all who detect God in the world — not only for biblical creationists (people like me), but for anyone who believes in any sort of intelligent design at all. Anyone who's spent time around hard-core evolutionists knows how many of them share Mirecki's attitudes. It's just that his have been exposed for all to see.

I think it's fair to say that what I call the evolution lobby is atheistic to the core. Yes, I know: Not everyone who's bought into evolution is an atheist. But I'm talking about the really committed Darwinists. I mean the ones who insist not just that there've been changes within species, but that all species evolved from other species, through unguided mutations. I mean the ones who say all this just had to take many millions of years because, with no Designer, it takes a really long time for all these random mutations to fall into place in the right way (more or less).

If you think about it, this position practically has to be atheistic. Everyone who takes it must demand that the making of the world can be explained entirely without God. If you buy that claim, the only "god" you can believe in is one who doesn't do anything — not in the physical world, anyway, which is the only world science can recognize. Oh, maybe there's some sort of vague, abstract, spiritual entity out there, but it doesn't deal in material things: It doesn't make anything. The only "god" who can exist, in short, is a disposable one: one who doesn't have to exist.

For obvious reasons, Darwinists often shy away from making this point when dealing with the general public. They're more likely to say that science and religion are just two separate fields, each with its own designated territory, and if each steers far clear of the other, we'll all get along just fine.

That's not how they talk among themselves, though. (More about that in a moment.) And from time to time, they let their real attitudes spill out in a way that's — well, let's just say "ill-advised."

Case in point: The intelligent-design (ID) movement, which points to evidence that the world didn't just come together by lucky accident. ID backers have marshaled a lot of arguments (covered in Boundless articles like this, this and this), and a growing number of legislators and school boards are interested in having those arguments taught in school. Darwinists are freaking out at the prospect, as you can tell by perusing many periodicals and Web sites: They say it amounts to teaching "creationism in disguise" or "creationism lite" — which, to them, is pretty much the ultimate insult.

It's also pretty plainly false. ID advocates contend only that some intelligent force was at work, and they don't attempt to name that force in their work.

Creationists, citing the Bible's authority, take positions on when the world was made, how long it took to make, and Who made it. Moreover, they hold that the answers to all those questions are vital, since they address key theological issues (like the scriptural statement that there was no death in the world before sin), and since ID alone could be compatible with many religions. Those are hardly minor matters. Whatever you think on these issues, you can't say ID and creationism are fundamentally identical. The most you might say is that they're both theistic.*

To Darwinists, though, any sort of theism is an intolerable intrusion — which gets us back to how they talk among themselves.

Take Kansas State University professor Scott C. Todd, in the thoroughly evolutionist Nature magazine (Sept. 30, 1999): "Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic." Or take Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin's discussion of a book by Carl Sagan, in the decidedly secular (and decidedly liberal) New York Review of Books (Jan 9, 1997):

The primary problem is not to provide the public with the knowledge of how far it is to the nearest star and what genes are made of.... Rather, the problem is to get them to reject irrational and supernatural explanations of the world, the demons that exist only in their imaginations, and to accept a social and intellectual apparatus, Science, as the only begetter of truth.... We exist [solely] as material beings in a material world, all of whose phenomena are the consequences of material relations among material entities.

And that's that: Nothing else will do. Sure, Lewontin admits, it leads to lots of theories that are kinda shaky. But that's just the way things have to be — because "we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism."

It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counterintuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.

Well now. Statements like this shed a lot of light on why Darwinists, for all their vaunted "open-mindedness," are so utterly narrow-minded on the most important matters. As Lewontin says, it's not science that drives them to deny God's handiwork.

Nor is it reason. Pure reason, after all, would never conclude that the universe can be understood entirely through human reason, or through human science. Pure reason would recognize the uses of these things, but also their limits. Pure reason would never deny there could be a God beyond our comprehension. Pure reason would never assume (for example) that God could never have created separate species ex nihilo, simply because biological descent is the only way we've ever seen life come into existence. Pure reason would never declare that commonalities between different species must indicate common ancestors, when they might as easily reflect a common designer Who creates according to His will.

In short, a human who possessed pure reason could do no more than admit his incompetence to resolve such matters by his own faculties. But humans don't have pure reason, nor anything close to it. What we do have — in abundance — is that most basic of sins, pride.

And that, I think, is what's really behind the narrow-mindedness of evolutionists. They just can't abide a God Who works His will in ways and for purposes they can't understand. All of us rebel against Him by nature, of course, but scientists have a special temptation. From an early age they soak up the conceit that they're the smartest people around, and that their powerful minds can discern the secrets of the universe. They may not even concede this as a sin; they're in a field which treats it as a virtue. (Besides, as they're told since youth, all the smart people are evolutionists.)

No wonder they don't want anything to do with the God of the Bible: He spoils the whole game of gaining knowledge that will make them, in some sense, "as gods." As biophysicist Cornelius G. Hunter points out in his book Darwin's God (which I reviewed here), Darwin and his successors proceed on their ideas of what they think God "should" have done based on what they would have done if they were God. They take no account either of how man's sin corrupted all creation, or of God's clear statement that "My ways [are] higher than your ways and My thoughts than your thoughts" (Isaiah 55:9).

The would-be smartest people around haven't passed Christianity 101. And when we get right down to it, that's not because they're not smart enough. It's because they just don't want to take the course — and to submit themselves to the Instructor.


* In theory, ID wouldn't even have to be theistic; it leaves room for theories that (for example) technologically advanced aliens guided the development of life on earth. But in practice, ID is widely understood to imply some deity at work as the most likely explanation.
Post a Comment

<< Home

* * * Great Archives Here - - - - "Music That H Enjoys" Below * * *

* * * Great Archives Here - - - - "Music That Howdy Enjoys" Below * * *

December 26   January 02   January 09   January 16   January 23   January 30   February 06   February 13   February 20   February 27   March 06   March 13   March 20   March 27   April 03   April 10   April 17   April 24   May 01   May 08   May 15   May 22   May 29   June 05   June 19   June 26   July 03   July 10   July 17   July 24   July 31   August 07   August 21   August 28   September 04   September 11   September 18   September 25   October 02   October 09   October 16   October 23   October 30   November 06   November 13   November 20   November 27   December 04   December 11   December 18   December 25   January 01   January 08   January 15   January 22   January 29   February 05   February 12   February 19   December 30  

Jesus and The Da Vinci Code

How Can I Know God???

Tales of Narnia

Answering Islam

The Da Vinci Code

A Short Look At Six World Religions

Bible - God's Word in different languages...

Bible Study Info

Christian Web Info

Don't Be Left Behind

For The University Crowd

Hard Questions Answered

How to become a Christian

Mr. Contoversial

Great For Kids

Stories For Kids

Bible Knowledge Challenge

The Young Earth Club

Who Is Jesus???

Christian Apologetics

Christian Web Info

God Bless The USA

Great Christians In History

History of American Christianity

Bible Instructions


Dr. Ben Haden

Bible Search Tools

Kids For Truth

Lincoln - A Christian

Mission To America

One Place For Learning

Our Daily Bread

President Lincoln

Red Skelton's Pledge of Allegiance

Intellectual Takeout

Evangelical Viewpoint

Dr. John Vernon McGee

Insight For Living

Turning Point

Outstanding Bible Teacher

Dr. Tony Evans

Listen To The Bible

Is Jesus God?

Great Bible Teaching

*America - Why I Love Her - Big John Wayne*

The Church & Israel

How To Become A Christian

*Watch The Jesus Movie*


Your very own library

Muhammad or Jesus???

Why The U.S.A. Is At War - 1

Why The U.S.A. Is At War - 2

Christian Women

Is Jesus God?

Statement Of What Howdy Believes!!!

Bible Crosswords

Great Bible Teacher

All About Cults

Religion Comparison

The Relationship of the Church to Israel

Just For Guys

Church History

***Watch The Jesus Movie***
{Many Languages}

Music That Ho Enjoys

God Bless America - Kate Smith

Military Music

Boston Pops: God Bless America

This Land Is Your Land

Blue Moon

Say A Prayer

Hawaii Five O


The Battle Of New Orleans

Beverly Hillbillies

Indiana Jones

James Bond



Mission Impossible

Peter Gunn


Singing In The Rain

Star Wars

Top Gun

Peggy Sue



Chuck Berry

Rock Around The Clock

Dueling Guitars

Blueberry Hill

A Taste Of Honey - clip

(I Left My Heart) In San Francisco - clip

Take The 'A' Train - clip

Hello, Dolly! - clip

Peggy Sue - clip

Theme From Peter Gunn - clip

Song from Moulin Rouge


Ebb Tide

Tara's Theme from Gone with the Wind

Around the World in 80 Days

Breakfast at Tiffany's


The Way We Were

You Do Something to Me



A Foggy Day



Arrivederci Roma

Theme from Moulin Rouge II

Stardust - Big Band



Rhapsody in Blue

Sleepy Lagoon

My Foolish Heart

Lisbon Antigua

La Mer

April in Portugal

Because of You

Poor People of Paris

Unchained Melody

Stranger on the Shore


Maple Leaf Rag

Voices of Spring

Emperor Waltz

Radetzky March

Water Music (Excerpt) George Frideric Handel

Finale - William Tell Overture

Overture - My Fair Lady

The Rain in Spain

The Lonely Bull - Herb Alpert

Tijuana Taxi - Herb Alpert

The Happy Whistler

So Rare

Mona Lisa

Ghost Riders in the Sky

Walk, Don't Run

Wonderland by Night

Canadian Sunset

Blue Tango

The Happy Wanderer

Down Yonder

Midnight in Moscow

Crazy Medley


That's for Me

Quiet Village

Harbor Lights

Dueling Banjoes II

Autumn Leaves

My Foolish Heart

Don't Know Much






Close To You

Rainy Days & Mondays

Sing A Song

Yesterday Once More

We've Only Just Begun

Goodbye To Love

Only You

As Time Goes By

As Time Goes By II

As Time Goes By - Original

After Loving

San Francisco

Stranger In Paradise

Mrs. Howdy

Rags To Riches

The Good Life

Hello Dolly

All Of Me

Thank Heaven For Little Girls

Beyond The Sea

Everybody Loves

Return To Me

That's Amore

Autumn Leaves

Love Me With All Your Heart

If I Give My Heart To You

Autumn Leaves II

Autumn Leaves III

See The USA

My Prayer

You Always Hurt

Take Me Out To The Ballgame

Love Me Tender

Its Now Or Never

Old Shep

Dont Be Cruel

When I Fall In Love

When I Fall In Love II

When I Fall In Love III

A Fool Such As I

You'll Never Know


I'm Yours

Wish You Were Here

Lady Of Spain


It's Magic

Secret Love

This Magic Moment

My Prayer

Twilight Time

Great Pretender

Harbor Lights

Little Darlin'


No Other Love

Magic Moments

Till The End Of Time

Dont Let The Stars

Overture - Barber of Seville

Back In The Saddle

You Always Hurt

When I Fall

When A Man

True Love



In The Mood

A Taste Of Honey

The Lonely Bull

Lollipops And Roses

This Guys In Love With You

What Now My Love

Three Coins In The Fountain

You've Gotta Have Heart


Stranger In Paradise II

Love Is...


Georgia On My Mind

Sentimental Over You

Thanks For The Memories

Too Young


Never On Sunday

Yellow Rose Of Texas


My Little Corner

Speak Low

Moments To Remember


Be My Love

Embassy Waltz


A Certain Smile

Chances Are

Not For Me To Say

Stranger On The Shore

I'll Be Seeing You

Cherry Pink


Moonlight Serenade

Last Date

Naughty Lady

Til I Kissed You

All I Have To Do Is Dream

Dixie Land Band

Ghost Riders In The Sky

The Happy Wanderer


Santa Catalina

Band Of Gold

Auld Lang Syne

The Wayward Wind

P.S. I Love You

Harbor Lights

Ebb Tide

Lime Light

Green Door

My Heart Cries

Down Yonder

Silvana Mangano Anna

Does Your Chewing Gum?

Grand Night For Singing

Purple People Eater

Orange Blossom Special

I'll Get By

'Til Then

Katie At UNC

Love Letters

As Time Goes By

Cheek To Cheek

Mission Impossible

The Way You Look Tonight


Glad To Be An American

Battle Hymn Of The Republic

How Great Thou Art

Have Thine Own Way

Beyond The Sunset

Amazing Grace

He's Got The Whole World

Peace In The Valley

How Great Thou Art II

Stars & Stripes Forever

Tennessee Waltz

Beverly Hillbillies Theme

El Paso

Happy Trails

Big John

Sixteen Tons

Which Doctor?

Wonderful! Wonderful!



The Lion Sleeps Tonight

Mr. Sandman

Bad Leroy

Only The Lonely


Magnificent 7

Magnificent 7 - II


I Walk The Line

God loves you so much that He died for you!!!


Click Here

Verse of the Day

* * * Four important things to KNOW: #1) For ALL (Americans, Muslims, Jews, Catholics, Hindus, Buddhist, Asians, Presbyterians, Europeans, Baptist, Brazilians, Mormons, Methodist, French, etc.) have sinned & fall short of the glory of God. #2) For the wages of above (see #1) are DEATH (Hell, eternal separation from God, & damnation) but the Gift (free & at no charge to you) of God (Creator, Jehovah, & Trinity) is Eternal Life (Heaven) through (in union with) Jesus Christ (God, Lord, 2nd Person of The Trinity, Messiah, Prince of Peace & Savior of the World). #3) For God so greatly loved & dearly prized the world (Americans, Muslims, Jews, Catholics, Hindus, Buddhist, Asians, Presbyterians, Europeans, Baptist, Brazilians, Mormons, Methodist, French, etc.) that He even gave up His only begotten (unique) Son, that whosoever (anyone, anywhere, anytime - while still living) believes (trust in, relies on, clings to, depends completely on) Him shall have eternal (everlasting) life (heaven). #4) Jesus said: "I am THE WAY, THE TRUTH, & THE LIFE. No one (male/female - American, Muslim, Jew, Catholic, Hindu, Buddhist, Asian, Presbyterian, European, Baptist, Brazilian, Mormons, Methodist, French, etc. ) comes (arrives) to the Father (with GOD in Heaven) EXCEPT BY (through) ME (no other name). *** This wonderful loving GOD gives you the choice - - - (Rev. 3:20) {Please note that church membership, baptism, doing good things, etc. are not requirements for becoming a Christian - however they are great afterwards!!!} *** Jesus said, "Wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction (Hell, damnation, eternal punishment), and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life (Heaven, eternal happiness, forever with God), and only a few find it.

D I S C L A I M E R If someone should ask if it's legal to download songs
found on various non-commercial sites, such as this one.

Well, I'm neither a lawyer nor a technician,
and I've begun to wonder if it was legal for
us to tape music off the radio back when
tape recorders first came into being.

And were we committing a crime when we recorded
a movie shown on TV with our VCRs? And was it
really legal to buy a dual-deck recorder for the
express purpose of duplicating cassettes?

My answer to all of the above is, "I don't know."

Nonetheless, here is a formal statement in
some kind of legalize that appears to apply
to this kind of file availability:

The songs on this site are copyrighted by their respective artists and are placed here
for evaluation purposes only. No profits or sales are made on this site from their use.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?